The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at their BMR you actually get a reduction in BMR above what you would expect based on the loss of lean tissue and fat tissue because fat tissue is Rel somewhat metabolically active there's actually up to like on average a 15% reduction in BMR
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we see this in people who lose weight so if we take people with the same lean body mass and fat Mass people who have never been obese people who have been obese and weight reduced the weight reduced people will have a lower BMR than the people that have never had to lose fat