The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the pediatric society a long time ago realized that juice has so much fructose that it was being associated with obesity in children so they made recommendations to limit fruit juice to like six ounces or less for uh adult i mean for older children in like four ounces or so for really small children
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the pediatric society a long time ago realized that juice has so much fructose that it was being associated with obesity in children so they made recommendations to limit fruit juice to like six ounces or less for adult i mean for older children in like four ounces or so for really small children
so the Pediatric Society a long time ago realized that juice has so much fructose that it was being associated with obesity in children so they made a a recommendation to limit fruit juice to like 6 ounces or less uh for uh adult I mean for older children in like four ounces or so for really small children