The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
oh absolutely part of the pathway through which ampd is working involves the generation of uric acid so we know that the uric acid when it's going up inside the cell is doing all kinds of biologic effects and the ampd is driving that there may be other things besides the uric acid so the hummingbird or the squirrel can still store fat they just don't get the bump in uric acid that comes with it because they don't have the uricase mutation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.