We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think the cluster randomized trials we see in the childhood obesity literature you know bring to mind the phrase that rhymes with cluster muck and it just this is cluster muck this is distorted evidence this is science gone wrong in the worst sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think the cluster randomized trials we see in the childhood obesity literature you know bring to mind the phrase that rhymes with cluster muck and it just this is cluster muck this is distorted evidence this is science gone wrong in the worst sense