The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there are certain people where uh their personal fat threshold is much lower so if you look at typically like asian indians who are thin they actually have a lower fat threshold and so they start storing visceral fat very quickly whereas you know it's a typical american they start gaining a lot of sub-q fat first and have a higher personal fat threshold before they start storing visceral fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
East Asia, Southeast Asia their fat cells on average are sign there the one paper I'm recalling where it looked it took Caucasian men and South Asian men and did an atapose subcutaneous biopsy and it found that the average South Asian man had atyposytes that were about four times larger volumetrically than the fat cells in the Caucasian at the same body size same body fat percent they just had much bigger fat cells
Some ethnicities like whites and blacks have the ability to make new fat cells. So these are ethnicities that can be a little fatter than other ethnicities and yet have lower levels of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. And that's what we see in the US. High rates of obesity but relatively modest rates of type2 di.