The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we then found years later in follow-up again published in science and new england journal of medicine is that there was less obesity and diabetes in those assigned to move to the less poor neighborhoods and given the financial wherewithal to do so
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what they then found years later in follow-up again published in science and new england journal of medicine is that there was less obesity and diabetes in those assigned to move to the less poor neighborhoods and given the financial wherewithal to do so
what they then found years later in follow-up again published in science and New England Journal of Medicine is that there was less obesity and diabetes in those assigned to move to the less poor neighborhoods and given the financial wherewithal to do so