The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well it at the individual level yeah yeah i mean i think it really hinges on how we define the term affluent because if you go to the very poorest people in the world there still is not a lot of obesity in those places places that are really challenged with food security where the diet is very limited like subsistence farmers in sub-saharan africa you're still going to see that there's a low prevalence of obesity in that pla in those places
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.