The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
unlike glucose that it triggers another pathway in which the an atp degradation pathway and that is um not considered a caloric pathway it's not part of the calories but what it's uh but what it's doing is it's activating um metabolic processes that lead to the development of diabetes obesity um hypertension and all these things are driven by this side chain reaction
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it's not the calories of fructose that are driving obesity it's not the calories from fructose it's the fact that fructose lowers the energy and keeps the energy levels low and this is due to this runaway renegade enzyme fructokinase that just takes all the atp it can i mean to phosphorylate the fructose as as its season