The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you have more medicine and more insulin resistance and more type 2 diabetes we know that those phenotypes are associated with greater discordance between apob and ldlc suggesting that you have a greater and greater portion of the population that is being undiagnosed or being under-diagnosed because you're treating their ldlc and you believe that it's lower than their risk actually is because their APO B is higher
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.