The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
malnutrition starvation insults early in life would stunt muscle development basically limited the DNA development limited the cellular development and basically they stunted lean mass in in the children and in the animals and if that was stunted basically uh what happened is the the IND the individual as an adult was always predestined to have low lean body mass and high body fat obesity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
malnutrition starvation insults early in life would stunt muscle development basically limited the DNA development limited the cellular development and basically stunted lean mass and in the children and in the animals and if that was stunted basically uh what happened is the the IND the individual as an adult was always predestined to have low lean body mass and high body fat obesity
so basically you're decreasing your lean mass you're decreasing your metabolically active tissue uh and and and so you're sort of stuck with minimal calories will deposit fat