Peter Attia· MD
and was named the diabetes mouse that's because that animal looked like an OB mouse but got diabetes very early in life unlike the OB mouse which seemed to be obese but not necessarily particularly diabetes problem
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and was named the diabetes mouse that's because that animal looked like an OB mouse but got diabetes very early in life unlike the OB mouse which seemed to be obese but not necessarily particularly diabetes problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it was clear that the mutation in the gene again another single gene that caused the diabetes Mouse was not the OB gene it was on a different chromosome