The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so because they were consuming massive amounts, they could drink as much of the sugary water as they want. They drank five, three to four times as much water, sugary water, as if they just had the water without the sugar. And a consequence, they became massively obese and they had accelerated polyp formation in the context of having knockout of the APC gene.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.