The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well I mean a far simpler explanation is look at people who are drinking diet soda versus people who are drinking soda you could make an argument and I think this is the argument that as a person is becoming more metabolically ill and they're being informed that they really need to stop drinking soda they're going to be drinking diet soda
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a far simpler explanation is look at people who are drinking diet soda versus people who are drinking soda you could make an argument and I think this is the argument that as a person is becoming more metabolically ill and they're being informed that they really need to stop drinking soda they're going to be drinking diet soda