The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When I was first in product development there was this thing of oh you need a pill especially for chronic indications you need a pill um for um compliance right who would take an injection for cardiovascular for cholesterol look at obesity drugs turns out a lot of people would take an injection if they want to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
When I was first in product development, there was this thing of oh you need a pill especially for chronic indications. You need a pill um for um compliance, right? Who would take an injection for cardiovascular for cholesterol? Look at obesity drugs. Turns out a lot of people would take an injection if they want to.