The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then you know scaling that back for someone that's not working out like you yeah or serving like 400 yeah like maybe 100 120 grams of carbohydrates for even someone that that is obese and trying to lose weight I don't think that's harmful for them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
or serving like 400 yeah like maybe 100 120 grams of carbohydrates for even someone that that is obese and trying to lose weight I don't think that's harmful for them