Peter Attia· MD
optimal might be you would lose 30 percent of your body weight but it would disproportionately be adipose tissue and you might only lose 10 of your strength or none at all
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
optimal might be you would lose 30 percent of your body weight but it would disproportionately be adipose tissue and you might only lose 10 of your strength or none at all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
optimal might be you would lose 30% of your body weight but it would disproportionately be adapost tissue and you might only lose 10% of your strength or none at all