The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
from 1909 it's a nut to 2000s this is from your book you can see this this grey line is obesity it's rising to 30% of the population and if we extended this graph in 2020 this would be up to 40% for obesity and then you can see that what happens is that as obesity rates are rising carbohydrate rates were going down and then carbohydrate rates have come up amount of consumption of carbohydrates come up a little bit but nothing more than they were in 1909
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
why it said when we're when our carbs dropped off beginning in 1999 when people started talking about going low carb um why did our obesity continue to increase carbs are going down i mean carbs went down they were like i mean and this is not consumption this is total food available which is why you'll see that the carbs were so high like 500 plus grams a day which you know nobody quite eats that much but so this is total food available but it's down it dropped down to something like uh 470 400 480 grams a day by 2010 while obesity continued to climb