The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you can answer those three questions which you can in a very short perod of time with a relatively small amount of data that tells you does this person need to eat more less or the same total energy the same amount of protein or less and how important and what type of exercise should they be doing to augment our findings
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when I'm looking at a patient given how important those things are to me it makes sense to be evaluating those things at the outset so when we do a dexa scan on some body on day one and we can see how much subcutaneous fat they have how much visceral fat they have how much muscle mass they have and we can do a lot of advanced blood work and see how metabolically healthy they are how well they dispose of glucose all these other things