The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so immediately following smoking the next leading sort of environmental i hate that term environmental toxin but basically this number two environmental predisposition to cancer is obesity and again i talked about this in the past i don't think it's obesity or adiposity per se i think it's the metabolic environment that accompanies obesity and hyperinsulinemia and all of these other things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i suspect much of the benefit in cancer comes through the metabolic benefits that of exercise so — we know for example that the second leading environmental or modifiable risk of cancer after smoking is in fact obesity
right after smoking obesity is obviously the second leading uh modifiable risk factor associated with cancer I've always thought that was an oversimplification because we use obesity as a proxy but I think it's probably insulin resistance that's the true marker that obesity is serving as a poor man's version of
obesity is obviously the second leading uh modifiable risk factor associated with cancer I've always thought that was an oversimplification because we use obesity as a proxy but I think it's probably insulin resistance that's the true marker that obesity is serving as a poor man's version of