The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Omega-3, the way I like to think of it is it's got the safety profile of a nutrient, but it is pharmacologically active and, you know, and so many people are not getting enough of it. Something like 80% globally do not get enough EPA and DHA, and like 95% of people in the U.S. do not get enough.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.