The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
oh yeah they were nobody had any problems tolerating it um gi now is this where the origin i mean because you hear for the most part when you think about safety of omega-3 it's it seems like you know is there an upper tolerable intake level i mean people are more concerned most concerned about the potential um you know as they like to call it quote-unquote quote blood-thinning effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.