Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I think my strong conviction had generally been that excessive amounts of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids or pou FFA's were generally not a good thing and the associative data there is not hard to understand but again the problem with the associative data is things that are full of omega-6 poof Azhar often crap so it's easy to see an association with high omega-6 polyunsaturated fat and disease chronic disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.