Peter Attia· MD
which is apoe4 carriers need a higher level of EPA and DHA to get the same benefit that appears to be empirically correct that would provide an explanation
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
which is apoe4 carriers need a higher level of EPA and DHA to get the same benefit that appears to be empirically correct that would provide an explanation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There's some evidence that for whatever reason, fish, when people that have ApoE4 are given fish or eaten fish they're protected against Alzheimer's disease, but DHA supplementation, it's not the same at least for ApoE-positive individuals.