Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
yeah i gotta tell you this caught everybody off guard didn't it because surely caught me it was certainly announced that the study was being stopped and i would say most observers myself included felt oh wow they're stopping it because the signal is so big and then they announced at the cardiology meeting actually it stopped because there's no signal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.