Rhonda Patrick· PhD
and then of course to follow it up with an analysis based on blood levels achieved instead of just by group assignment yeah
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then of course to follow it up with an analysis based on blood levels achieved instead of just by group assignment yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
your your outcome is based not on your assignment of groups but on to the omega-3 level achieved and then you can really see much more clearly oh the people they got a high level they did much better