The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
like the standard fatty acid desaturates the fads gene have very little effect mutations in that gene have very little effect on omega they affect omega-6 arachidonic acid levels pretty substantially those mutations and fatty acid desaturates but they don't affect the omega-3s very much at all two or three percent variability explained by that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.