The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Right, and you had done a small study where you had given people some omega-3 supplements along with some antioxidants and vitamin D, and it improved their phagocytosis of the amyloid plaques in the periphery, and also I think their cognition, some individuals had improved cognition, ApoE4 negative ones, I remember.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.