Peter Attia· MD
if we look at the literature as far as what we can say I mean it seems that we're on more stable ground saying that EPA and DHA are probably protective
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we look at the literature as far as what we can say I mean it seems that we're on more stable ground saying that EPA and DHA are probably protective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my thinking has evolved to the point where epa and DHA by themselves are quite potent drugs and we really ought to think of them in that way so that in fact you look at a drug like vez epi' which is just pharmaceutical grade epa at the tune of 4 grams I mean that is as potent as any anti cardiovascular disease drug that we have