The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's silly to think you can take somebody who's 65 years old who's had a crappy diet their whole life and put them in a omega-3 trial give them 840 milligrams of omega-3 like one capsule of lovasa and expect in three years to see a difference in cardiovascular endpoints i mean it's just ridiculous
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.