Rhonda Patrick· PhD
omega-3 fatty acids are at the least anti-catabolic and, likely, anabolic. They seem to do this by shifting the balance away from breakdown and more towards muscle building, particularly in the context of anabolic resistance.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
omega-3 fatty acids are at the least anti-catabolic and, likely, anabolic. They seem to do this by shifting the balance away from breakdown and more towards muscle building, particularly in the context of anabolic resistance.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Importantly, omega-3 seems to reverse this phenomenon in disuse atrophy, and possibly sarcopenia, too.
I believe the mechanism of action is the as the modulation of the lipid
and I believe the mechanism of action is the as the modulation of the lipid profile and at least you know certainly the phospholipid membrane but also potentially inside the cell itself