Paul Saladino· MD
my epa to arachidonic acid ratio is low but if you look at their reference range i'm at 0.1 anything greater than 0.2 is fine
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
my epa to arachidonic acid ratio is low but if you look at their reference range i'm at 0.1 anything greater than 0.2 is fine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the problem is the lack of epa and DHA if you get those up your racket on it levels will go down that's the best way to lower if you want a lower arachidonic is to take fish oil
japanese studies over a decade ago has suggested that a certain epa to arachidonic acid ratio was associated with substantially less cardiovascular disease in certain regions in japan