The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the highest level I've ever seen in RBC's about I've had a patient who was just taking this stuff by the truckload and which means he was probably taking about three grams a day maybe four I'm not sure but you know was sitting there at about 16% EPA plus DHA
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
whereas for red blood cell epa dha which is just the red cell membrane it might be five or six percent would be normal
the the certainly they're in a higher amount dha is always there in like four times the amount of epa i mean unless you're just taking pure epa then they'll be one to one roughly but in normal the normal situation um there's a lot more dha than epa