The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do think there is an argument that omega-3 is one of the it's up there I think I think getting yourself to a good omega-3 status and defining what that is is still like being investigated but um I do think that's a low-hanging fruit that should not be ignored
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think I think getting yourself to a good omega-3 status and defining what that is is still like being investigated but um I do think that's a low hanging fruit that should not be ignored
I do think there is an argument that omega-3 is one of the it's up there I think I think getting yourself to a good omega-3 status and defining what that is is still like being investigated but um I do think that's a low hanging fruit that should not be ignored