The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that by that time yarn Dyer burg had published a paper in Lancet 1978 proposing that EPA was an antiplatelet or like a blood thinning fatty acid and that that is why it prevented blood clots and that is why Eskimos didn't have heart attacks that was the proposal and EPA had been shown by that time to be antiplatelet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the platelets were less reactive less likely to clot which is a good thing so that fit with the idea that these are protecting against heart attacks