Rhonda Patrick· PhD
Since the invention of the omega-3 index, Dr. Harris and his colleagues continue to show its profound predictive value.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Since the invention of the omega-3 index, Dr. Harris and his colleagues continue to show its profound predictive value.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Well, I would say the omega-3 index. I only saw a couple of hands and I think that's like it's one of the it's one of the easiest things and you get a very robust effect in terms of the way you age cardiovascular brain mood muscle, endless, right? Life life expectancy.
And that's really where you want to be. And that's where you want to be for the brain benefits. That's where you want to be for the cardiovascular benefits, for the reducing, you know, aging. It seems like it's a a pretty good sweet spot and that's what I take.
We know the omega-3 index data and we know the outcomes are also affected. we know cardiovascular death, you know, is lower. We know that you're increasing life expectancy.