Paul Saladino· MD
with intermediate dose of 1.8 grams per day the increase in risk did not achieve statistical significance
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
with intermediate dose of 1.8 grams per day the increase in risk did not achieve statistical significance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with an intermediate dose of 1.8 grams per day the risk uh in the increase in Risk did not achieve statistical significance and with a standard daily dose of 840 milligrams per day there was no apparent increase in Risk although the data were consistent with as much as a 24% increase in Risk
and looked in vital and there was there was a slight increase but not statistically significant and afib and that was a lower dose it was 800 milligrams instead of 4000 milligrams