The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yes. And again, there was a metaanalysis in 2017, and I can't remember the name of the the lead author, um, but they basically did a meta analysis of the studies not confounded by trans fats. Now, they included some of the ones that had fish oil in them, um, or omega-3s, rather. >> Y, >> but they showed overall I I I again, I want to say it was around a 21 it was 29% reduction in risk.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.