The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they were probably 80% of their calories were fat and of that do you have a sense of how much was polyunsaturated versus saturated probably about maybe six or seven grams a day out of let's say let's say they ate 100 grams of fat a day so six or seven percent of it might have been the omega-3 Pali Pali etc it's very little omega-6 and probably 70% of the fat was saturated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.