Rhonda Patrick· PhD
the classic belief is that there's some concern about omega-3 and bleeding and we've tried to rebut that many times
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
81
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the classic belief is that there's some concern about omega-3 and bleeding and we've tried to rebut that many times
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah i mean we always kind of back up into this nowadays um anti-inflammatory effect and how that which is sort of a black box of because how that relates to risk for bleeding is not at all clear why they would even be related but so we don't really know why