The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I wonder though if that's also just a marker for poor health I know that's the challenge of all of those studies right is totally in some cases with smoking it's pretty obvious that there's causality there I think there also is with blood pressure um I I but you know you could argue that never in the history of the world has there been a person who has you know I'm making I'm being a bit facetious who has you know a high omega-3 index who eats junk food
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.