The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we've forgotten that nose-to-tail eating that including organs in your diet is critical we've forgotten that organ meats are nutritious uniquely that rail-raised meat of all sorts is incredibly nutrient-rich and should be a part of our diet and has been incorrectly vilified
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There are unique nutrients in these organs which is why we make desiccated organs at heart and soil to make it easier to get these unique foods in our diets
again if you're not getting organs in your life you're just missing out on the unique nutrients they provide