Paul Saladino· MD
and they do get taken in completely and they know they're important they just probably haven't seen a commercial uh or drug use yet so they're not really bothering to go after them
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and they do get taken in completely and they know they're important they just probably haven't seen a commercial uh or drug use yet so they're not really bothering to go after them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a whole category of things that i think are really fascinating which are peptides and nobody even thinks about this so this is beyond vitamins and minerals these small amino acid-containing molecules technically less than 50 amino acids and a lot of these we don't even know what they do in the human body but people who are in this biohacking sphere will have heard of things like ll-37 or bpc157 all these things have these esoteric names right or ipomarelin or tessamarelin and these are all peptides that people are using to biohack well a lot of these peptides are found in organ meats and they're found throughout the body in heart muscle there's a peptide called dwarf dworf which is associated with contractility and i think that if we don't overcook the organs or we get them from a desiccated source a lot of these peptides are preserved