The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you really want to be a healthy human animal foods are indispensable part of your diet because of these unique nutrients and if you really want to be strong against coronavirus or any immune infection we have to be metabolically healthy we have to be nutritionally healthy and everyone can decide what that looks like for them but I will make the case in my book that it's including a lot of animal foods
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.