The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's freaking amazing that in the 1930s they gave six to 11 year olds these these organ meats if we really believe we've lost things this is what i talk about with the remembering and the corollary concept of the forgetting here's an illustration of that less than 100 years ago it was common to consider as a medical researcher that you might offer kids all of the organs and let them select
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.