The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but as this article points out from four to six months especially in that period and then from six to 12 months kids don't eat a lot of food so the food that you give them i believe the food that we give them should be very nutrient rich what is the most nutrient-rich food it's organs and meat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if I had kids uh the first foods for my children would be meat and organs and I personally if I trusted the source of the liver I would give my children Raw Liver if if I were worried about the sourcing of the liver or the potential for contamination I might cook the liver or put it so cooked liver in a smoothie