The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and with that tendency for overload you will get repetitive stresses on the passive structures within that kinematic chain so as a clinician we know that if you tend to image these areas or if you image the spine these are the areas that tend to have the most degenerative changes or the most disk pathology and those changes aren't uh aren't usually uh traumatic they're not an acute they're accumulated over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.