The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, but I just want to make one thing to the listener a little bit clear, which is on the y-axis here, you're seeing units of grams per centime squared. Earlier I said g per cime cubed. Why the difference? Well, the difference is even though density in real life is measured in grams per centime cubed because you need mass per unit volume, with bone density, it's actually done as grams per centime squared because it's a planer measurement.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Well, the difference is even though density in real life is measured in grams per centime cubed because you need mass per unit volume, with bone density, it's actually done as grams per centime squared because it's a planer measurement.