Peter Attia· MD
So they kind of impair the mineralization of bone by favoring bone reabsorption during the early phase and then they kind of inhibit calcium absorption in the gut.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So they kind of impair the mineralization of bone by favoring bone reabsorption during the early phase and then they kind of inhibit calcium absorption in the gut.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So they kind of impair the mineralization of bone by favoring bone reabsorption during the early phase and then they kind of inhibit calcium absorption in the gut.