The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So we want to look at fractures related to mild or moderate trauma. So you look at somebody who's had a fall from standing height or less. That's you know someone who's fallen from such a low height and still had a fracture. That's a huge problem.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So we want to look at fractures related to mild or moderate trauma. So you look at somebody who's had a fall from standing height or less. That's, you know, someone who's fallen from such a low height and still had a fracture. That's a huge problem.
So we want to look at fractures related to mild or moderate trauma. Someone who's fallen from such a low height and still had a fracture. That's a huge problem.