The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at those data you'll see that bmd is maintained in in Master's athletes as long as they're maintaining their activity there may be a slight loss yes but that's probably because the loads that they're able to produce in their their physical performance also um reduce but it this is a this is an atrophy effect this is not a genetically programmed aging effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it could be that the what we see as a quote unquote physiologic decline of bone loss is not that it's rather a proxy for muscle loss and reduced activity